Kathleen Morales / A research story

What is
resilience
to you?

Keeping going? Recovering? Adapting?
The answer changes what we see—and what we measure.

Explore the framework ↓
A person surrounded by four interacting capacity domains within a wider context.
Multidimensional adaptive capacity · Conceptual framework

01 / From a word to a framework

Functioning is visible.
The cost may not be.

Resilience is used to describe a trait, a process, recovery, resistance, or an outcome. Those meanings are not interchangeable. Seeing someone continue to work, care for others, or meet expectations does not tell us what maintaining that functioning requires.

The proposition

In this framework, resilience is adaptive capacity under changing demands: the capacity to maintain, recover, improve, or transform functioning across time and context.

A proposed conceptual framing, not a validated resilience score.
What we can see

“I’m still doing everything.”

Work completed. Responsibilities met. Everyday life continues.

What we also need to ask

“What does it take?”

Which capacities support that functioning? What is being depleted? Is there room for recovery?

02 / A life in context

Demands begin before birth.
Adaptation continues through life.

From conception onward, development unfolds within biological and environmental conditions. The kinds of demand change, and so do the capacities and supports available to meet them. Demands are part of living; their intensity, duration, and distribution are not the same for everyone.

  1. 01

    Conception

    Prenatal conditions
    Developing systems

  2. 02

    Childhood

    Care and connection
    Learning and growth

  3. 03

    Adolescence

    Identity and belonging
    Changing demands

  4. 04

    Adulthood

    Work and caregiving
    Opportunity and constraint

  5. 05

    Later life

    Changing roles
    Recovery and support

Illustrative life-course contexts, not a prediction of any person’s trajectory.

03 / Simultaneous, not sequential

One person.
Four interacting domains.

The body regulates, the mind interprets, behavior organizes a response, and relationships connect us with the world. These processes overlap. A strength in one domain does not mean that every other domain is equally supported.

Four coexisting capacity domains around a person
Conceptual relationships; ring size does not represent measured capacity.
01 / Physiological

Regulate & recover

Biological regulation and recovery capacities that support responses to changing demands.

02 / Psychological & emotional

Interpret & respond

Perceived control, self-efficacy, flexibility, and emotional regulation.

03 / Behavioral

Act & adjust

Patterns of activity, sleep, coping, pacing, and recovery.

04 / Ecological

Connect & navigate

Belonging, relationships, participation, and navigation of the surrounding context.

Context surrounds all four domains. Structural conditions are not reduced to personal skills, and domain descriptions are not finalized measurement assignments.

04 / Energy ecology

A person is never
a closed system.

The broader energy-ecology idea asks how surroundings provide support, impose demands, direct attention, and create—or restrict—opportunities for restoration. Here, “energy” is an organizing analogy for capacity and effort, not a common physical unit or a literal equation for resilience.

INCOMING

Demands & supports

Conditions, relationships, resources, obligations, and opportunity.

WITHIN THE PERSON

Allocation & adaptation

Attention, regulation, action, and changing capacity across domains.

OVER TIME

Cost & restoration

Effort may accumulate; recovery and support may replenish capacity.

The practical aim is to reduce unnecessary expenditure and preserve the capacity to respond. A sustainable state is not necessarily the lowest possible activity level: learning, movement, and change may require effort now to build capacity later.

Notice → interpret → choose → act → restore → reassess

An intentional-adaptation cycle. Agency matters, but choices remain shaped by resources, safety, time, and structural constraints.

05 / The visual walkthrough

Follow the question,
one frame at a time.

A short presentation adapted from the framework materials. Move through the story at your own pace.

06 / From concept to investigation

Keep the question open.
Make the distinctions precise.

Kathleen’s developing thesis brings a multidimensional adaptive-capacity framework to planned investigation in NIH’s All of Us Research Program. It separates stress exposure, capacity indicators, and physiological burden so that their relationships can be examined rather than assumed.

01

Define

Clarify what each domain means and what belongs outside it.

02

Map

Connect constructs to available measures and assess their limitations.

03

Investigate

Examine associations with physiological burden, subject to data availability and cohort feasibility.

What the diagrams do—and do not—show

These are conceptual illustrations, not study results. Allostatic load is considered an indicator of multisystem physiological burden, not a direct meter of energy expenditure or an interchangeable measure of resilience. The framework and its proposed measurement approach remain in development.

Read the research and career profile ↗

07 / Why this connects to the work

Making complex science
useful to people.

Evidence & strategy

Define a difficult question, assess the evidence, and make uncertainty legible for decisions.

See published work ↗

Education & movement

Translate the framework into ways of discussing demand, pacing, attention, and recovery. These are developing applications.

Discuss a presentation ↗

Health innovation

Explore how scientific concepts can guide responsible development and communication, including the development-stage wINK venture.

Explore wINK ↗

Have a complex health or research question?

Let’s connect ↗